TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsColorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)

See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) with 8% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AI RMF Functions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Govern(3 mappings)

AIRMF-GV-1.1Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented3 targets
→CO-AIA-1702-1Developer Duty of Reasonable Care
→CO-AIA-1703-1Deployer Duty of Reasonable Care
→CO-AIA-1705Affirmative Defense and Recognised Frameworks

Manage(1 mappings)

AIRMF-MN-1.1AI risks are prioritised and resources are allocated to manage them
→CO-AIA-1703-2Risk Management Policy and Program

Map(1 mappings)

AIRMF-MP-1.1Context of AI system use is established and understood
→CO-AIA-1702-2Developer Documentation and Disclosures to Deployers

Measure(1 mappings)

AIRMF-MS-1.1Appropriate methods and metrics for measuring AI risk are identified and applied
→CO-AIA-1703-3Impact Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)20 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics16 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs ISO/IEC 23894:202314 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)13 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs OECD AI Principles12 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST Privacy Framework12 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Azure Security Benchmark12 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)11 mappings

Other Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) comparisons

OECD AI Principles vs Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)13 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)1 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)?

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AI RMF Functions, where 31 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)?

Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 4 map directly to Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)?

48 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205). The highest concentration of gaps is in AI RMF Functions with 31 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AI RMF Functions (31 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.