Cross-Framework Mapping

NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis ManagementvsISO 22301:2019

See exactly how NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 6 - Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Risk Management(4 mappings)

NFPA1600-04Risk Assessment2 targets
iso-22301-2019::6.1.2Risk assessment
iso-22301-2019::8.2.3Risk assessment
NFPA1600-05Business Impact Analysis2 targets
iso-22301-2019::8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
iso-22301-2019::8.2.2Business impact analysis

Chapter 4 - Program Management(1 mappings)

NFPA1600-4.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-22301-2019::5.1Leadership and commitment

Chapter 5 - Planning(4 mappings)

NFPA1600-5.1Risk Assessment2 targets
iso-22301-2019::6.1.2Risk assessment
iso-22301-2019::8.2.3Risk assessment
NFPA1600-5.2Business Impact Analysis2 targets
iso-22301-2019::8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
iso-22301-2019::8.2.2Business impact analysis

Related Comparisons

Other NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management comparisons

Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management and ISO 22301:2019?

NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 6 - Implementation, where 5 NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management and ISO 22301:2019?

Of 35 total NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls, 5 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management to ISO 22301:2019?

30 NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 6 - Implementation with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management and ISO 22301:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 6 - Implementation (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.