TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsNIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)

See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-State Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Scope(1 mappings)

NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→PQC-2FIPS 203 ML-KEM Implementation - Module-Lattice Key-Encapsulation Mechanism

Information Security Program(4 mappings)

NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 44 targets
→PQC-2FIPS 203 ML-KEM Implementation - Module-Lattice Key-Encapsulation Mechanism
→PQC-5Cryptographic Inventory and PQC Migration Roadmap
→PQC-7FIPS Validated Modules, HSM Readiness, and Algorithm Validation
→PQC-8Implementation Requirements - RNG, Side-Channel, Key Management, Operations, Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP MASVS4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ISO/SAE 214344 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 mappings

Other NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-State Compliance, where 1 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) equivalent.

How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

Of 8 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 2 map directly to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

6 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-State Compliance with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-State Compliance (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.