TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-State Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Scope(6 mappings)

NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions6 targets
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→3.7.1Key generation procedures
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Information Security Program(6 mappings)

NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 46 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Third Party Management(2 mappings)

NAIC-5Third Party Service Provider Oversight - Section 4(F)(3) and Section 52 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Incident Response(1 mappings)

NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
→3.7.1Key generation procedures

Related Comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP MASVS4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ISO/SAE 214344 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ISO 270174 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-State Compliance, where 1 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

4 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-State Compliance with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-State Compliance (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.