Montana Consumer Data Privacy ActvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Cure Sunset - Montana CDPA.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Data Protection Assessment - Montana CDPA(1 mappings)
Privacy Notice - Montana CDPA(1 mappings)
Scope and Authority - Montana CDPA(1 mappings)
Sensitive Data and Children - Montana CDPA(2 mappings)
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism - Montana CDPA(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Cure Sunset - Montana CDPA, where 1 Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 8 total Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act controls, 5 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
3 Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Cure Sunset - Montana CDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Cure Sunset - Montana CDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.