TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE D3FENDvsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how MITRE D3FEND controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE D3FEND maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE D3FEND controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Detect Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(1 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Detect-Tactic-File-Process-Network-Identifier-Message-Platform-Analysis-SIEM-EDRMITRE D3FEND Detect Tactic + File + Process + Network + Identifier + Message + Platform Analysis + SIEM + EDR
→OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Harden Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(5 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Harden-Tactic-Application-Credential-Message-Platform-Hardening-MFA-Encryption-Secure-BootMITRE D3FEND Harden Tactic + Application + Credential + Message + Platform + MFA + Encryption + Secure Boot5 targets
→OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
→OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
→OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
→OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE D3FEND comparisons

MITRE D3FEND vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP Top 10:202510 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs OWASP Top 10:202510 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs OWASP Top 10:202510 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE D3FEND and OWASP Top 10:2025?

MITRE D3FEND has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND, where 1 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE D3FEND and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 8 total MITRE D3FEND controls, 2 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE D3FEND to OWASP Top 10:2025?

6 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE D3FEND and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.