Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)vsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 50% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(11 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement2 targets
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege2 targets
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls3 targets
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls3 targets
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

Awareness and Training / Audit Assessment(3 mappings)

171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Configuration and Identification Assessment(5 mappings)

171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication2 targets
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication2 targets
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components

Incident Response and Maintenance Assessment(1 mappings)

171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and OWASP Top 10:2025?

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) has 32 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 4 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls, 16 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) to OWASP Top 10:2025?

16 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.