TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE D3FENDvsISO/IEC 27011:2024

See exactly how MITRE D3FEND controls map to ISO/IEC 27011:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE D3FEND maps to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE D3FEND controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Detect Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(1 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Detect-Tactic-File-Process-Network-Identifier-Message-Platform-Analysis-SIEM-EDRMITRE D3FEND Detect Tactic + File + Process + Network + Identifier + Message + Platform Analysis + SIEM + EDR
→27011-8.4Logging and monitoring

Evict Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(1 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Evict-Tactic-Credential-Process-Eviction-Containment-Incident-Response-RecoveryMITRE D3FEND Evict Tactic + Credential + Process Eviction + Containment + Incident Response + Recovery
→27011-8.6Data protection and backup

Harden Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(5 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Harden-Tactic-Application-Credential-Message-Platform-Hardening-MFA-Encryption-Secure-BootMITRE D3FEND Harden Tactic + Application + Credential + Message + Platform + MFA + Encryption + Secure Boot5 targets
→27011-5.3Segregation of duties
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
→27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management

Isolate Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(3 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Isolate-Tactic-Execution-Network-Isolation-Sandboxing-Microsegmentation-DNS-FilteringMITRE D3FEND Isolate Tactic + Execution + Network Isolation + Sandboxing + Microsegmentation + DNS Filtering3 targets
→27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→27011-8.2Network security and segregation

Scope and Foundation - MITRE D3FEND(3 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Scope-MITRE-NSA-2021-CC-BY-4-0-Countermeasure-Knowledge-Graph-Companion-ATTACK-OntologyMITRE D3FEND Scope + MITRE + NSA 2021 + CC BY 4.0 + Countermeasure Knowledge Graph + Companion to ATT&CK + Ontology3 targets
→27011-1Scope
→27011-3Terms and definitions
→27400-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE D3FEND comparisons

MITRE D3FEND vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs APRA CPS 2344 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202416 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO/IEC 27011:202416 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs ISO/IEC 27011:202415 mappingsUK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements vs ISO/IEC 27011:202414 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO/IEC 27011:202414 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

MITRE D3FEND has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27011:2024 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND, where 1 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27011:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

Of 8 total MITRE D3FEND controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE D3FEND to ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

3 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27011:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.