TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE D3FENDvsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how MITRE D3FEND controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE D3FEND maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE D3FEND controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Harden Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(9 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Harden-Tactic-Application-Credential-Message-Platform-Hardening-MFA-Encryption-Secure-BootMITRE D3FEND Harden Tactic + Application + Credential + Message + Platform + MFA + Encryption + Secure Boot9 targets
→27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
→27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
→27010-12.2Protection from malware
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

Isolate Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(2 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Isolate-Tactic-Execution-Network-Isolation-Sandboxing-Microsegmentation-DNS-FilteringMITRE D3FEND Isolate Tactic + Execution + Network Isolation + Sandboxing + Microsegmentation + DNS Filtering2 targets
→27010-13.1Communications Security
→27010-13.1Communications Security

Model Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(4 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Model-Tactic-System-Inventory-Network-Mapping-Identity-Discovery-Asset-IdentificationMITRE D3FEND Model Tactic + System Inventory + Network Mapping + Identity Discovery + Asset Identification4 targets
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.2Membership Termination
→27010-8.2Membership Termination

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE D3FEND comparisons

MITRE D3FEND vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27010:201510 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

MITRE D3FEND has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND, where 1 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 8 total MITRE D3FEND controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE D3FEND to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

5 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.