TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsISO 31000:2018

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to ISO 31000:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to ISO 31000:2018 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control2 targets
→6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
→6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container
→6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 134855 mappings

Other ISO 31000:2018 comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 31000:20183 mappingsISO 13485 vs ISO 31000:20183 mappingsVirginia CDPA vs ISO 31000:20182 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs ISO 31000:20182 mappingsUruguay DPL vs ISO 31000:20182 mappingsTurkey KVKK vs ISO 31000:20182 mappingsTexas Data Privacy Act vs ISO 31000:20182 mappingsTaiwan PDPA vs ISO 31000:20182 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 31000:2018?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000:2018 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct ISO 31000:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 31000:2018?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 2 map directly to ISO 31000:2018 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to ISO 31000:2018?

6 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 31000:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.