Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 14004:2016vsISO 31000:2018

See exactly how ISO 14004:2016 controls map to ISO 31000:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 14004:2016 maps to ISO 31000:2018 with 31% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 ISO 14004:2016 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support – ISO 14004:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 14004:2016(3 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::10.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment
iso-14004-2016::10.3Continual improvement
4.hContinual improvement
iso-14004-2016::10.3.2Implementation of continual improvement
iso-31000-2018::5.5Implementation

Context of the organization – ISO 14004:2016(3 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-31000-2018::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-14004-2016::4.2.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment
iso-14004-2016::4.4.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment

Leadership – ISO 14004:2016(1 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-31000-2018::5.2Leadership and commitment

Planning – ISO 14004:2016(2 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::6.1.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment
iso-14004-2016::6.2.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment

Support – ISO 14004:2016(3 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::7.4Communication
iso-31000-2018::6.2Communication and consultation
iso-14004-2016::7.4.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment
iso-14004-2016::7.5.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment

Operation – ISO 14004:2016(5 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control5 targets
iso-31000-2018::5.1General
iso-31000-2018::6.1General
iso-31000-2018::6.3.1General
iso-31000-2018::6.4.1General
iso-31000-2018::6.5.1General

Performance evaluation – ISO 14004:2016(2 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::9.1.1General
6.5.1General risk treatment
iso-14004-2016::9.1.2Evaluation of compliance
iso-31000-2018::5.6Evaluation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 14004:2016 and ISO 31000:2018?

ISO 14004:2016 has 48 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000:2018 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support – ISO 14004:2016, where 8 ISO 14004:2016 controls have no direct ISO 31000:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 14004:2016 and ISO 31000:2018?

Of 48 total ISO 14004:2016 controls, 15 map directly to ISO 31000:2018 controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 14004:2016 to ISO 31000:2018?

33 ISO 14004:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support – ISO 14004:2016 with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 14004:2016 and ISO 31000:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support – ISO 14004:2016 (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.