MARS-EvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how MARS-E controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
MARS-E maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 88% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MARS-E controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Scope and Authority - MARS-E v2.0.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.
Access Control and Identity Authentication - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Audit Accountability and Continuous Monitoring - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Incident Response and Breach Notification - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Security Control Catalog NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)
Privacy PII PHI Protection - MARS-E v2.0(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other MARS-E comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 700 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between MARS-E and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
MARS-E has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Scope and Authority - MARS-E v2.0, where 1 MARS-E controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between MARS-E and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 8 total MARS-E controls, 7 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 88% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
1 MARS-E controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Scope and Authority - MARS-E v2.0 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Scope and Authority - MARS-E v2.0 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.