TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal DatavsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls map to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data maps to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Article 4-12(1 mappings)

DOM172-Lawful-Basis-Consent-Notice-Information-Duty-Articles-4-12-Quality-Principle-Purpose-Limitation-MinimisationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Information Duty + Articles 4-12
→X805-Dim8-Privacy-Identification-Network-Activity-Personal-Information-ConfidentialityITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 8 - Privacy + Identification of Network Activity + Personal Information Confidentiality + Subscriber Anonymity + Pseudonymity + Anti-Tracking + Location Privacy + Data Minimization + GDPR/CCPA Alignment

Security + Article 25 + Breach Notification + Article 22(1 mappings)

DOM172-Security-Measures-Article-25-Encryption-Pseudonymization-Access-Control-Incident-Handling-Breach-Notification-Article-22Dominican Republic Law 172-13 Security Measures + Article 25 + Encryption + Breach Notification
→X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20235 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Bahrain PDPL5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20205 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappings

Other ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

NIST Privacy Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsSOC 2 vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data has 8 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024, where 1 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 8 total Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls, 2 map directly to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

6 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.