TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Italy Codice Cross-Border + Retention.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Italy Codice Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

ItalyCodice-DataSubjectRights-Limitations-Deceased-Minors-14-Years-Italian-2undecies-2duodecies-2terdeciesItaly Codice Data Subject Rights + Article 2-undecies Limitations + Article 2-duodecies Deceased Persons Rights + Article 2-terdecies Minors Rights (14 Years Consent Age) + GDPR Articles 15-22 + Italian Civil Procedure Remedies
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Italy Codice Garante + Enforcement(2 mappings)

ItalyCodice-Garante-Enforcement-AdministrativeSanctions-Criminal-Art166-167-170-20MEUR-Coord-EDPBItaly Codice Garante Authority + Article 140-bis + Article 144 Complaints + Article 166 Administrative Sanctions up to EUR 20M/4% + Article 167 Criminal Offences + Article 170 Failure to Comply with Garante Orders + EDPB Coordination2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Italy Codice Special Categories(1 mappings)

ItalyCodice-SpecialCategories-Health-Workplace-Education-ScientificResearch-HistoricalResearch-Art75-92-96-99-101Italy Codice Special Categories + Article 75 Administrative Fines + Article 92 Medical Records + Article 96 Education + Article 99 Scientific Research + Article 101 Historical Research + Workplace Privacy + Worker Monitoring Article 4 Workers Statute
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Italy Codice ePrivacy(1 mappings)

ItalyCodice-ePrivacy-Cookies-ElectronicCommunications-Telemarketing-PublicOpposition-TrafficDataRetention-Art121-122-130-132Italy Codice ePrivacy - Article 121 Electronic Communications + Article 122 Cookies and Tracking + Article 130 Unsolicited Direct Marketing + Article 132 Traffic Data Retention + Italian Public Opposition Register (Registro delle Opposizioni)
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
Coverage crosswalk

A Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls your existing Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) into FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) into Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 50% in the header counts how many Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) comparisons

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)4 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)4 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010)4 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)4 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)3 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Vermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA)3 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ)3 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsUAE Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) Regulations vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Italy Codice Cross-Border + Retention, where 1 Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls, 4 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

4 Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Italy Codice Cross-Border + Retention with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Italy Codice Cross-Border + Retention (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.