ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 46% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(6 mappings)
Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(2 mappings)
Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(6 mappings)
Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 24 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security, where 4 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 24 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 11 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
13 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.