Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsUruguay DPL

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to Uruguay DPL. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to Uruguay DPL with 26% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(2 mappings)

27400-5.4Data and privacy risks2 targets
URUGUAY-1Scope, Lawful Basis, Consent
URUGUAY-5Database Registration with AGESIC URCDP

Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(3 mappings)

27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
URUGUAY-3Sensitive Data, Health Data, Children
27400-6.3Secure Update Mechanism
URUGUAY-4Security and Cross-Border
27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
URUGUAY-4Security and Cross-Border

Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(6 mappings)

27400-7.1Network Security for IoT2 targets
URUGUAY-4Security and Cross-Border
URUGUAY-5Database Registration with AGESIC URCDP
27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation2 targets
URUGUAY-1Scope, Lawful Basis, Consent
URUGUAY-5Database Registration with AGESIC URCDP
27400-7.4Data retention and deletion2 targets
URUGUAY-4Security and Cross-Border
URUGUAY-5Database Registration with AGESIC URCDP
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Uruguay DPL crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Uruguay DPL controls your existing ISO/IEC 27400:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 into Uruguay DPL
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Uruguay DPL into ISO/IEC 27400:2022
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Uruguay DPL (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 26% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Uruguay DPL controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Uruguay DPL?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 27 controls across its framework, while Uruguay DPL covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework, where 7 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct Uruguay DPL equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Uruguay DPL?

Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 7 map directly to Uruguay DPL controls, representing 26% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Uruguay DPL?

25 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in Uruguay DPL. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Uruguay DPL?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.