Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsGeorgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) with 7% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Organisational(1 mappings)

27011-5.2Information Security Roles in Telecoms
GeDPL-PDPS-Enforcement-SanctionsPersonal Data Protection Service (PDPS), Enforcement Powers and Sanctions

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-5.2Information Security Roles in Telecoms
GeDPL-PDPS-Enforcement-SanctionsPersonal Data Protection Service (PDPS), Enforcement Powers and Sanctions

People(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
GeDPL-PDPS-Enforcement-SanctionsPersonal Data Protection Service (PDPS), Enforcement Powers and Sanctions

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
GeDPL-PDPS-Enforcement-SanctionsPersonal Data Protection Service (PDPS), Enforcement Powers and Sanctions

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-8.6Data protection and backup
GeDPL-PDPS-Enforcement-SanctionsPersonal Data Protection Service (PDPS), Enforcement Powers and Sanctions

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

Other Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 11 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 5 map directly to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

45 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.