ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 56% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(9 mappings)
Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(5 mappings)
Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(3 mappings)
Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)
Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)
+6 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 27 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications, where 3 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 15 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
12 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.