TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsISO 27018:2019

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to ISO 27018:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to ISO 27018:2019 with 18% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Operations(1 mappings)

27010-12.1Operational Procedures
→iso-27018-2019::12.1Operational procedures and responsibilities

Clause 11-13: Physical, Operations, and Communications Security(4 mappings)

27010-12.1Operational Procedures
→iso-27018-2019::12.1Operational procedures and responsibilities
27010-12.2Protection from malware
→iso-27018-2019::12.2Protection from malware
27010-13.2Information transfer2 targets
→iso-27018-2019::13.2Information transfer
→iso-27018-2019::13.2.1Information transfer policies and procedures

Policy(1 mappings)

27010-5.1Management Direction
→iso-27018-2019::5.1Management direction for information security

Clause 5-6: Information Security Policies and Organization(2 mappings)

27010-5.1Management Direction
→iso-27018-2019::5.1Management direction for information security
27010-6.2Contact with Authorities
→iso-27018-2019::6.1.3Contact with authorities

Organisation(1 mappings)

27010-6.2Contact with Authorities
→iso-27018-2019::6.1.3Contact with authorities

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts8 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management8 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 58 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.08 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIS2 Directive7 mappings

Other ISO 27018:2019 comparisons

ISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27018:201932 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 27018:201928 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27018:201923 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27018:201913 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs ISO 27018:201912 mappingsISO 27043 vs ISO 27018:201912 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs ISO 27018:201910 mappingsPCI DSS 4.0 vs ISO 27018:20198 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and ISO 27018:2019?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 28 controls across its framework, while ISO 27018:2019 covers 84 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 6 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct ISO 27018:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and ISO 27018:2019?

Of 28 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 8 map directly to ISO 27018:2019 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to ISO 27018:2019?

38 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27018:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and ISO 27018:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.