TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27002:2022vsISO 27018:2019

See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to ISO 27018:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
61
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27002:2022 maps to ISO 27018:2019 with 31% coverage across 29 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 94 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 65 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 94 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022(1 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::0.1Background and context
→iso-27018-2019::0.1Background and context

Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022(15 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::5.1Policies for information security2 targets
→iso-27018-2019::5.1.1Policies for information security
→iso-27018-2019::5.1.2Review of the policies for information security
iso-27002-2022::5.14Information transfer2 targets
→iso-27018-2019::13.2Information transfer
→iso-27018-2019::13.2.1Information transfer policies and procedures
iso-27002-2022::5.2Information security roles and responsibilities
→iso-27018-2019::6.1.1Information security roles and responsibilities
iso-27002-2022::5.25Assessment and decision on information security events
→iso-27018-2019::16.1.4Assessment of and decision on information security events
iso-27002-2022::5.26Response to information security incidents
→iso-27018-2019::16.1.5Response to information security incidents
iso-27002-2022::5.27Learning from information security incidents
→iso-27018-2019::16.1.6Learning from information security incidents
iso-27002-2022::5.28Collection of evidence
→iso-27018-2019::16.1.7Collection of evidence
iso-27002-2022::5.3Segregation of duties
→iso-27018-2019::6.1.2Segregation of duties
iso-27002-2022::5.35Independent review of information security
→iso-27018-2019::18.2.1Independent review of information security
iso-27002-2022::5.37Documented operating procedures
→iso-27018-2019::12.1.1Documented operating procedures
iso-27002-2022::5.4Management responsibilities
→iso-27018-2019::7.2.1Management responsibilities
iso-27002-2022::5.5Contact with authorities
→iso-27018-2019::6.1.3Contact with authorities
iso-27002-2022::5.6Contact with special interest groups
→iso-27018-2019::6.1.4Contact with special interest groups

People controls – ISO 27002:2022(2 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::6.4Disciplinary process
→iso-27018-2019::7.2.3Disciplinary process
iso-27002-2022::6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
→iso-27018-2019::13.2.4Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements

Physical controls – ISO 27002:2022(2 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::7.11Supporting utilities
→iso-27018-2019::11.2.2Supporting utilities
iso-27002-2022::7.12Cabling security
→iso-27018-2019::11.2.3Cabling security

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons

ISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202417 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 19011:201812 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27701:20198 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27017:20157 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO/IEC 29100:20247 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO/IEC 38500:20247 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.17 mappings

Other ISO 27018:2019 comparisons

ISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 27018:201928 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27018:201923 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27018:201913 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs ISO 27018:201912 mappingsISO 27043 vs ISO 27018:201912 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs ISO 27018:201910 mappingsPCI DSS 4.0 vs ISO 27018:20198 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 27018:20196 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and ISO 27018:2019?

ISO 27002:2022 has 94 controls across its framework, while ISO 27018:2019 covers 84 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 29 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022, where 22 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct ISO 27018:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and ISO 27018:2019?

Of 94 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 29 map directly to ISO 27018:2019 controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 65 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to ISO 27018:2019?

65 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27018:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022 with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and ISO 27018:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022 (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.