TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27017:2015vsISO 27018:2019

See exactly how ISO 27017:2015 controls map to ISO 27018:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27017:2015 maps to ISO 27018:2019 with 50% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ISO 27017:2015 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud sector-specific concepts – ISO 27017:2015.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Cryptography – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::10.1Cryptographic controls
→iso-27018-2019::10.1Cryptographic controls

Physical and environmental security – ISO 27017:2015(3 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::11.1Secure areas
→iso-27018-2019::11.1Secure areas
iso-27017-2015::11.2Equipment2 targets
→iso-27018-2019::11.2.1Equipment siting and protection
→iso-27018-2019::11.2.4Equipment maintenance

Operations security – ISO 27017:2015(6 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::12.1Operational procedures and responsibilities
→iso-27018-2019::12.1Operational procedures and responsibilities
iso-27017-2015::12.2Protection from malware
→iso-27018-2019::12.2Protection from malware
iso-27017-2015::12.4Logging and monitoring
→iso-27018-2019::12.4Logging and monitoring
iso-27017-2015::12.5Control of operational software
→iso-27018-2019::12.5Control of operational software
iso-27017-2015::12.6Technical vulnerability management
→iso-27018-2019::12.6Technical vulnerability management
iso-27017-2015::12.7Information systems audit considerations
→iso-27018-2019::12.7Information systems audit considerations ISO/IEC 27018:2019

Communications security – ISO 27017:2015(3 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::13.1Network security management
→iso-27018-2019::13.1Network security management
iso-27017-2015::13.2Information transfer2 targets
→iso-27018-2019::13.2Information transfer
→iso-27018-2019::13.2.1Information transfer policies and procedures

Information security incident management – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::16.1Management of information security incidents and improvements
→iso-27018-2019::16.1Management of information security incidents and improvements

Compliance – ISO 27017:2015(2 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::18.1Compliance with legal and contractual requirements
→iso-27018-2019::18.1Compliance with legal and contractual requirements
iso-27017-2015::18.2Information security reviews
→iso-27018-2019::18.2Information security reviews

Information security policies – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::5.1Management direction for information security
→iso-27018-2019::5.1Management direction for information security

Organization of information security – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::6.1Internal organization
→iso-27018-2019::6.1Internal organization

Human resource security – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::7.1Prior to employment
→iso-27018-2019::7.1Prior to employment

Clause 9 – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::9.1Business requirements of access control
→iso-27018-2019::9.1Business requirements of access control

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27017:2015 comparisons

ISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27701:201930 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 270438 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO/SAE 214348 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27002:20226 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20155 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 19011:20185 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 270183 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO/IEC 27018:20193 mappings

Other ISO 27018:2019 comparisons

ISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27018:201932 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 27018:201928 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27018:201913 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs ISO 27018:201912 mappingsISO 27043 vs ISO 27018:201912 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs ISO 27018:201910 mappingsPCI DSS 4.0 vs ISO 27018:20198 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 27018:20196 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27017:2015 and ISO 27018:2019?

ISO 27017:2015 has 42 controls across its framework, while ISO 27018:2019 covers 84 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud sector-specific concepts – ISO 27017:2015, where 5 ISO 27017:2015 controls have no direct ISO 27018:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27017:2015 and ISO 27018:2019?

Of 42 total ISO 27017:2015 controls, 21 map directly to ISO 27018:2019 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27017:2015 to ISO 27018:2019?

21 ISO 27017:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27018:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud sector-specific concepts – ISO 27017:2015 with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27017:2015 and ISO 27018:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud sector-specific concepts – ISO 27017:2015 (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.