Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Incidents(3 mappings)

27010-15.1Incident Management3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning

Clause 14-16: System Development, Supplier Relations, and Incident Management(3 mappings)

27010-15.1Incident Management3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 28 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 6 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

Of 28 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 2 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

44 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.