Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security with 11% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cryptography(1 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
62351-9Cyber security key management

Clause 9-10: Access Control and Cryptography(3 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
62351-9Cyber security key management
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)

Access Control(2 mappings)

27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 28 controls across its framework, while IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 6 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

Of 28 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 6 map directly to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

40 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.