Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

HKMA C-RAF Domain 1-2: Governance + Identification (Cyber Strategy, Risk Mgmt, Asset Mgmt, Threat Assessment)(1 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment
62351-2Glossary of terms

HKMA C-RAF Domain 3-4: Protection + Detection (Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing)(2 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel2 targets
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
62351-9Cyber security key management

HKMA C-RAF Domain 5-6: Response & Recovery + Situational Awareness (IR, Recovery, Threat Intel, Info Sharing)(2 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing2 targets
62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Other IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 11 controls across its framework, while IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline, where 4 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

Of 11 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 3 map directly to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

8 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.