Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 21% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cryptography(2 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection2 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Clause 9-10: Access Control and Cryptography(7 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection2 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information2 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources3 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.3Account Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Physical(1 mappings)

27010-11.1Physical Protection
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Clause 11-13: Physical, Operations, and Communications Security(3 mappings)

27010-11.1Physical Protection
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
27010-12.2Protection from malware
AWWA-4.1Malware Protection
27010-13.1Communications Security
AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation

Communications(1 mappings)

27010-13.1Communications Security
AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation

Access Control(5 mappings)

27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information2 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources3 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.3Account Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 28 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 6 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 28 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 11 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

35 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.