Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality ModelvsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 22% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics(1 mappings)

ISO-25012-4.11Traceability
NAIC-668-4D5Audit Trails

Data Quality Model Application(13 mappings)

ISO-25012-5.1Establishing data quality requirements
DMF-1.1Data Governance Structure
ISO-25012-5.2Defining data quality measures6 targets
7012(a)Definitions
Art. 17Governance Structure
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
DMF-1.1Data Governance Structure
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities
ISO-25012-5.3Planning and performing data quality evaluations6 targets
7012(a)Definitions
Art. 17Governance Structure
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
DMF-1.1Data Governance Structure
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model has 18 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics, where 6 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 18 total ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls, 4 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

14 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.