ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality ModelvsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls map to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model maps to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) with 28% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics(3 mappings)
System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics(2 mappings)
Data Quality Model Application(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model comparisons
Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model has 18 controls across its framework, while NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics, where 6 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls have no direct NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
Of 18 total ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls, 5 map directly to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
13 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls have no direct equivalent in NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.