Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 18% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 56 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex Guidance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 56 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Scope, Terms and References (Clauses 1-3)(2 mappings)

ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS

Framework (Clause 5)(9 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

Process (Clause 6)(7 mappings)

ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

AI-Specific Risk Sources (Annex A)(2 mappings)

ISO23894-A.6AI System Security2 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 701 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 56 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 80 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex Guidance, where 8 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 56 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 10 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

46 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex Guidance with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annex Guidance (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.