Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 37001:2016vsISO/IEC 38500:2024

See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to ISO/IEC 38500:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 37001:2016 maps to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 with 20% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 37001:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(11 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::5.1.1Governing body10 targets
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.10.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.11.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.12.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.2.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.3.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.4.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.6.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.7.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.8.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.9.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-37001-2016::5.3.1Roles and responsibilities
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.11Social responsibility

Support – ISO 37001:2016(4 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::7.2.1General
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2.1General
iso-37001-2016::7.2.2Employment process
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2Elements of the framework
iso-37001-2016::7.4Communication
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2.2Direction
iso-37001-2016::7.5.1General
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2.1General

Performance evaluation – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::9.3Management review
iso-iec-38500-2024::6.3Management of IT practice
iso-37001-2016::9.3.2Governing body review
iso-iec-38500-2024::6.2Governance of IT practice

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

ISO 37001:2016 has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 38500:2024 covers 66 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 37001:2016, where 10 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 38500:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

Of 41 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 8 map directly to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

33 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 38500:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 37001:2016 with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 37001:2016 (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.