Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020vsISO/IEC 38500:2024

See exactly how ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls map to ISO/IEC 38500:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

117
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 maps to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 with 41% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 117 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Existing frameworks applicable to trustworthiness – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(2 mappings)

iso-iec-tr-24028-2020::5.2Recognition of layers of trust
iso-iec-38500-2024::4.1Outcomes of good governance of IT
iso-iec-tr-24028-2020::5.4Application of risk management
iso-iec-38500-2024::4.1Outcomes of good governance of IT

Stakeholders – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(4 mappings)

iso-iec-tr-24028-2020::6.1General concepts4 targets
iso-iec-38500-2024::6.2Governance of IT practice
iso-iec-38500-2024::6.4Framework for the governance of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.1General
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2.1General

Clause 8 – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(14 mappings)

iso-iec-tr-24028-2020::8.1General14 targets
iso-iec-38500-2024::4.1.1Overview
iso-iec-38500-2024::4.1.2Effective performance
iso-iec-38500-2024::4.1.4Ethical behaviour
iso-iec-38500-2024::4.2Principles, model and framework
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.10.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.11.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.12.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.2.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.3.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.4.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.6.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.7Stakeholder engagement
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.7.2Governance implications for use of IT
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.8Leadership

+97 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 has 54 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 38500:2024 covers 66 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020, where 16 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 38500:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

Of 54 total ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls, 22 map directly to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 to ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

32 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 38500:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is Mitigation measures – ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.