ISO 55001:2024vsISO 55001:2014
See exactly how ISO 55001:2024 controls map to ISO 55001:2014. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 55001:2014 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 55001:2024 maps to ISO 55001:2014 with 100% coverage across 38 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 ISO 55001:2024 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 1,121 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 52 control mappings across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 1,121 frameworks.
Improvement – ISO 55001:2024(5 mappings)
Context of the organization – ISO 55001:2024(10 mappings)
Leadership – ISO 55001:2024(4 mappings)
Planning – ISO 55001:2024(1 mappings)
+32 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 1,121 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The ISO 55001:2024 to ISO 55001:2014 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 55001:2014 controls your existing ISO 55001:2024 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. ISO 55001:2024 into ISO 55001:2014 lands at 100%, while ISO 55001:2014 into ISO 55001:2024 lands at 71.1%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO 55001:2024 evidence buys you for ISO 55001:2014, the other asks the reverse.
27 of 27 ISO 55001:2014 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 55001:2024. 0 are genuine gaps.
27 of 38 ISO 55001:2024 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 55001:2014. 11 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many ISO 55001:2024 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 55001:2014 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 55001:2024 comparisons
Other ISO 55001:2014 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 1,121 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 1,121 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 55001:2024 and ISO 55001:2014?
ISO 55001:2024 has 38 controls across its framework, while ISO 55001:2014 covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 38 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General, where 0 ISO 55001:2024 controls have no direct ISO 55001:2014 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 55001:2024 and ISO 55001:2014?
Of 38 total ISO 55001:2024 controls, 38 map directly to ISO 55001:2014 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 55001:2024 to ISO 55001:2014?
0 ISO 55001:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 55001:2014. The highest concentration of gaps is in General with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 55001:2024 and ISO 55001:2014?
The domain with the highest gap count is General (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are judged interpretations, grounded in the source text of both frameworks, and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.