Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management SystemsvsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
45
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 8% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Context of the organization – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems(1 mappings)

iso-50001-2018-energy-management-systems::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
AS9100D2016-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action

Leadership – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems(3 mappings)

iso-50001-2018-energy-management-systems::5.1Leadership and commitment3 targets
AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
AS9100D2016-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment

Support – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems(1 mappings)

iso-50001-2018-energy-management-systems::7.5Documented information
AS9100D2016-7.5Documented Information

Operation – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems(3 mappings)

iso-50001-2018-energy-management-systems::8.1Operational planning and control3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
AS9100D2016-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems has 53 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Context of the organization – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems, where 24 ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 53 total ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems controls, 4 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

49 ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Context of the organization – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Context of the organization – ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.