ISO 28002:2011vsISO 22301:2019
See exactly how ISO 28002:2011 controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 28002:2011 maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 97% coverage across 36 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 28002:2011 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in The standard, its annexes and its status – ISO 28002:2011.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
Clause 4: Requirements of the management system containing a resilience policy – ISO 28002:2011(7 mappings)
Annex A: Resilience policy and management responsibility – ISO 28002:2011(1 mappings)
Annex A: Planning – ISO 28002:2011(7 mappings)
Annex A: Implementation and operation – ISO 28002:2011(5 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A ISO 28002:2011 to ISO 22301:2019 crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22301:2019 controls your existing ISO 28002:2011 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many ISO 28002:2011 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22301:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 28002:2011 comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 28002:2011 and ISO 22301:2019?
ISO 28002:2011 has 37 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 36 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in The standard, its annexes and its status – ISO 28002:2011, where 5 ISO 28002:2011 controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 28002:2011 and ISO 22301:2019?
Of 37 total ISO 28002:2011 controls, 36 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 28002:2011 to ISO 22301:2019?
15 ISO 28002:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in The standard, its annexes and its status – ISO 28002:2011 with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 28002:2011 and ISO 22301:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is The standard, its annexes and its status – ISO 28002:2011 (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.