TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27799vsHL7 FHIR Security Framework

See exactly how ISO 27799 controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27799 maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27799 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

ISO 27799: Patient Data Protection(9 mappings)

ISO27799-01ePHI access controls and authorization4 targets
→A01:2025Broken Access Control
→FHIR-SEC-2.2SMART App Launch
→FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
→FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization
ISO27799-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit2 targets
→A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
→FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security
ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access3 targets
→FHIR-SEC-1.2Time Keeping
→FHIR-SEC-4.1AuditEvent Logging
→FHIR-SEC-4.3Audit Log Review

ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-08Information access management2 targets
→A01:2025Broken Access Control
→FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control

ISO 27799: Technical Safeguards(5 mappings)

ISO27799-12Unique user identification and authentication3 targets
→A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
→FHIR-SEC-2.1User Authentication
→FHIR-SEC-2.3System-to-System Authentication
ISO27799-16Transmission security and encryption2 targets
→A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
→FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security

ISO 27799: Physical Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-17Facility access controls2 targets
→A01:2025Broken Access Control
→FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27799 comparisons

ISO 27799 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsISO 27799 vs ISO 1348512 mappingsISO 27799 vs NIST SP 800-6612 mappingsISO 27799 vs MDS2 (Medical Device)12 mappingsISO 27799 vs MARS-E12 mappingsISO 27799 vs GLI-33 - Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems11 mappingsISO 27799 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)11 mappingsISO 27799 vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)11 mappings

Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsSpain ENS vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 720 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27799 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

ISO 27799 has 46 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards, where 5 ISO 27799 controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27799 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

Of 46 total ISO 27799 controls, 7 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27799 to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

39 ISO 27799 controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27799 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.