TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27799vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how ISO 27799 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27799 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 22% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27799 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

ISO 27799: Patient Data Protection(5 mappings)

ISO27799-01ePHI access controls and authorization
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
ISO27799-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
ISO27799-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
ISO27799-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-08Information access management
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
ISO27799-09Security awareness and training program
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

ISO 27799: Technical Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-12Unique user identification and authentication
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
ISO27799-16Transmission security and encryption
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

ISO 27799: Physical Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO27799-17Facility access controls
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27799 comparisons

ISO 27799 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsISO 27799 vs ISO 1348512 mappingsISO 27799 vs NIST SP 800-6612 mappingsISO 27799 vs MDS2 (Medical Device)12 mappingsISO 27799 vs MARS-E12 mappingsISO 27799 vs GLI-33 - Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems11 mappingsISO 27799 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsISO 27799 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework11 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI 600-1: Generative AI Profile vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsGLI-33 - Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 719 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27799 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

ISO 27799 has 46 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 4 ISO 27799 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27799 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 46 total ISO 27799 controls, 10 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27799 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

36 ISO 27799 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27799 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.