Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsHL7 FHIR Security Framework

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Security and Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 341K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 341K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(1 mappings)

AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
HL7-FHIR-Auth-SMART-OAuth-OIDC-BackendHL7 FHIR Authentication - SMART App Launch + OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect + Backend Services + Token Lifetime

Access Control and Identity Management(2 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management
HL7-FHIR-Auth-SMART-OAuth-OIDC-BackendHL7 FHIR Authentication - SMART App Launch + OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect + Backend Services + Token Lifetime
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
HL7-FHIR-Auth-SMART-OAuth-OIDC-BackendHL7 FHIR Authentication - SMART App Launch + OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect + Backend Services + Token Lifetime

Network and Communications Security(2 mappings)

AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
HL7-FHIR-Transport-TLS-CommunicationHL7 FHIR Transport Security - TLS 1.2+, Communication Security, Time Keeping, Server CapabilityStatement
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
HL7-FHIR-Transport-TLS-CommunicationHL7 FHIR Transport Security - TLS 1.2+, Communication Security, Time Keeping, Server CapabilityStatement

System Security and Operations(2 mappings)

AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring2 targets
HL7-FHIR-Audit-Provenance-DigitalSignatures-IntegrityHL7 FHIR Audit + Provenance + Digital Signatures + AuditEvent Resource + Audit Log Integrity + Retention
HL7-FHIR-Transport-TLS-CommunicationHL7 FHIR Transport Security - TLS 1.2+, Communication Security, Time Keeping, Server CapabilityStatement

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (341K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Security and Operations, where 3 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 6 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

31 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Security and Operations with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Security and Operations (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.