ISO 27043vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how ISO 27043 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27043 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 21% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 ISO 27043 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Investigative.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.
ISO 27043: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)
ISO 27043: Access Control(4 mappings)
ISO 27043: Cryptography(4 mappings)
ISO 27043: Operations Security(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27043 comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 706 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27043 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
ISO 27043 has 52 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Investigative, where 6 ISO 27043 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27043 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 52 total ISO 27043 controls, 11 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27043 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
41 ISO 27043 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Investigative with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27043 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Investigative (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.