TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27017:2015vsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how ISO 27017:2015 controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27017:2015 maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ISO 27017:2015 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations security – ISO 27017:2015.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Operations security – ISO 27017:2015(3 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::12.1Operational procedures and responsibilities2 targets
→27010-12.1Operational Procedures
→27010-12.1Operational Procedures
iso-27017-2015::12.2Protection from malware
→27010-12.2Protection from malware

Communications security – ISO 27017:2015(1 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::13.2Information transfer
→27010-13.2Information transfer

Information security policies – ISO 27017:2015(2 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::5.1Management direction for information security2 targets
→27010-5.1Management Direction
→27010-5.1Management Direction

Clause 8 – ISO 27017:2015(2 mappings)

iso-27017-2015::8.2Information classification2 targets
→27010-7.1Information Classification for Sharing
→27010-7.1Information Classification for Sharing

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27017:2015 comparisons

ISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27701:201930 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27018:201921 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 270438 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO/SAE 214348 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27002:20226 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 19011:20185 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 270183 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO/IEC 27018:20193 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27017:2015 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

ISO 27017:2015 has 42 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations security – ISO 27017:2015, where 5 ISO 27017:2015 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27017:2015 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 42 total ISO 27017:2015 controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27017:2015 to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

37 ISO 27017:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations security – ISO 27017:2015 with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27017:2015 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations security – ISO 27017:2015 (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.