ISO 27002:2022vsAPRA CPS 234
See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to APRA CPS 234. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which APRA CPS 234 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27002:2022 maps to APRA CPS 234 with 28% coverage across 26 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 78 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022(20 mappings)
+27 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The ISO 27002:2022 to APRA CPS 234 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 234 controls your existing ISO 27002:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. ISO 27002:2022 into APRA CPS 234 lands at 75%, while APRA CPS 234 into ISO 27002:2022 lands at 16.1%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO 27002:2022 evidence buys you for APRA CPS 234, the other asks the reverse.
18 of 24 APRA CPS 234 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 6 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Information security roles and responsibilities defined and allocated across the organisation.
Grounded in iso-27002-2022::5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
The Board carries ultimate responsibility for the entity information security and must ensure it is maintained in proportion to the threats facing the information assets.
Every one of the 18 evidenced controls and 6 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
15 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 234. 78 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Sets the direction the policy framework must give, which is the topic specific policy content.
Grounded in CPS234-P19 Policy Direction to All Responsible Parties. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Requires rules for acceptable use, and procedures for handling information and its associated assets, to be identified, documented and put into effect.
Every one of the 15 evidenced controls and 78 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 28% in the header counts how many ISO 27002:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 234 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons
Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and APRA CPS 234?
ISO 27002:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 234 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 26 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022, where 32 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct APRA CPS 234 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and APRA CPS 234?
Of 93 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 26 map directly to APRA CPS 234 controls, representing 28% coverage. The remaining 78 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to APRA CPS 234?
78 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 234. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022 with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and APRA CPS 234?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022 (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.