NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1vsAPRA CPS 234
See exactly how NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls map to APRA CPS 234. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which APRA CPS 234 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 maps to APRA CPS 234 with 20% coverage across 38 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls identifies 153 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in C-SCRM Family: Program Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 191 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
C-SCRM Family: Access Control(2 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Awareness and Training(2 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(10 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Configuration Management(1 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Contingency Planning(2 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Incident Response(3 mappings)
+38 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to APRA CPS 234 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 234 controls your existing NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
14 of 24 APRA CPS 234 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 10 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Names the leadership roles owning risk and distinguishes them from system owners.
Grounded in 161R1-PM-29 Risk Management Program Leadership Roles. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
The Board carries ultimate responsibility for the entity information security and must ensure it is maintained in proportion to the threats facing the information assets.
Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 10 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 20% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 234 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 comparisons
Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and APRA CPS 234?
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 has 191 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 234 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 38 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C-SCRM Family: Program Management, where 20 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct APRA CPS 234 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and APRA CPS 234?
Of 191 total NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls, 38 map directly to APRA CPS 234 controls, representing 20% coverage. The remaining 153 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to APRA CPS 234?
153 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 234. The highest concentration of gaps is in C-SCRM Family: Program Management with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and APRA CPS 234?
The domain with the highest gap count is C-SCRM Family: Program Management (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.