ISO 27001:2022vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27001:2022 maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 14% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 82 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
A.5 Organizational Controls(10 mappings)
A.6 People Controls(1 mappings)
A.7 Physical Controls(1 mappings)
A.8 Technological Controls(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 33 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 13 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 82 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
82 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.