TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsISO 9001:2015

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to ISO 9001:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
88
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to ISO 9001:2015 with 0% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 118 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 0 – ISO 27001:2022(2 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::0.1General
→iso-9001-2015::0.1General
iso-27001-2022::0.2Compatibility with other management system standards
→iso-9001-2015::0.2Quality management principles

Organizational controls – ISO 27001:2022(3 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::5.1Policies for information secu- Control
→iso-9001-2015::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-27001-2022::5.2Information security roles and Control
→iso-9001-2015::5.2Policy
iso-27001-2022::5.3Segregation of duties Control
→iso-9001-2015::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

People controls – ISO 27001:2022(3 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::6.1Screening Control
→iso-9001-2015::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-27001-2022::6.2Terms and conditions of em- Control
→iso-9001-2015::6.2Quality objectives and planning to achieve them
iso-27001-2022::6.3Information security awareness, Control
→iso-9001-2015::6.3Planning of changes

Physical controls – ISO 27001:2022(4 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::7.1Physical security perimeters Control
→iso-9001-2015::7.1Resources
iso-27001-2022::7.2Physical entry Control
→iso-9001-2015::7.2Competence
iso-27001-2022::7.3Securing offices, rooms and fa- Control
→iso-9001-2015::7.3Awareness
iso-27001-2022::7.4Physical security monitoring Control
→iso-9001-2015::7.4Communication

Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022(6 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::9.2.2Internal audit programme
→iso-9001-2015::9.2Internal audit
iso-27001-2022::9.3.1General
→iso-9001-2015::9.3.1General
iso-27001-2022::9.3.2Management review inputs2 targets
→iso-9001-2015::9.3Management review
→iso-9001-2015::9.3.2Management review inputs
iso-27001-2022::9.3.3Management review results2 targets
→iso-9001-2015::9.3Management review
→iso-9001-2015::9.3.3Management review outputs

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 578 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 272 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)67 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.066 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs GDPR42 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.135 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs C5 (Germany)24 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappings

Other ISO 9001:2015 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsICH E6(R3) - Good Clinical Practice vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsFDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 9001:20157 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO 9001:20157 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015?

ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while ISO 9001:2015 covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 39 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct ISO 9001:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015?

Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 0 map directly to ISO 9001:2015 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 118 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to ISO 9001:2015?

118 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 9001:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 39 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (39 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.