C5 (Germany)vsFedRAMP Moderate
See exactly how C5 (Germany) controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
C5 (Germany) maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 95% coverage across 115 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 121 C5 (Germany) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in C5: Dealing with Investigation Requests from Government Agencies.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 121 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 362 mapped controls across 16 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
C5: Asset Management(20 mappings)
+342 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The C5 (Germany) to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing C5 (Germany) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. C5 (Germany) into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 37.2%, while FedRAMP Moderate into C5 (Germany) lands at 71.1%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your C5 (Germany) evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.
120 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for C5 (Germany). 203 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
C5 requires a documented role and rights concept and access management policy issued to those it binds.
Grounded in C5-IDM-01 Policy for user accounts and access rights. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Prevent further access by initiating device lock after 15 minutes inactivity (FedRAMP) or upon user request.
Every one of the 120 evidenced controls and 203 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
86 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 35 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Component inventory kept accurate and current with the attributes needed to manage the assets, which is what the criterion requires
Grounded in CM-8 System Component Inventory. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Document, communicate and issue acceptable use and safe handling instructions spanning approval for acquisition through disposal, classification and labelling, secure configuration, software versions and patching, unsupported software,...
Every one of the 86 evidenced controls and 35 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 95% in the header counts how many C5 (Germany) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other C5 (Germany) comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between C5 (Germany) and FedRAMP Moderate?
C5 (Germany) has 121 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 115 overlapping controls (95% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C5: Dealing with Investigation Requests from Government Agencies, where 4 C5 (Germany) controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.
How many controls map between C5 (Germany) and FedRAMP Moderate?
Of 121 total C5 (Germany) controls, 115 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 95% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping C5 (Germany) to FedRAMP Moderate?
6 C5 (Germany) controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in C5: Dealing with Investigation Requests from Government Agencies with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between C5 (Germany) and FedRAMP Moderate?
The domain with the highest gap count is C5: Dealing with Investigation Requests from Government Agencies (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.