ISO 22301:2019vsSOC 2
See exactly how ISO 22301:2019 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22301:2019 maps to SOC 2 with 98% coverage across 56 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls identifies 1 compliance gap, primarily concentrated in Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 969 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 162 control mappings across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 969 frameworks.
Improvement, ISO 22301:2019(8 mappings)
Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019(12 mappings)
+142 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 969 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The ISO 22301:2019 to SOC 2 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing ISO 22301:2019 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
17 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 22301:2019. 44 are genuine gaps.
20 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 37 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 98% in the header counts how many ISO 22301:2019 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 969 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 969 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22301:2019 and SOC 2?
ISO 22301:2019 has 57 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 56 overlapping controls (98% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019, where 1 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22301:2019 and SOC 2?
Of 57 total ISO 22301:2019 controls, 56 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 98% coverage. The remaining 1 control represents a compliance gap requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22301:2019 to SOC 2?
1 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22301:2019 and SOC 2?
The domain with the highest gap count is Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.