Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22301:2019vsNIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

See exactly how ISO 22301:2019 controls map to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

73
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
98%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 22301:2019 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22301:2019 maps to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 with 98% coverage across 56 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls identifies 1 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 73 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Improvement, ISO 22301:2019(3 mappings)

iso-22301-2019::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action2 targets
161R1-CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones
161R1-PM-4Plan of Action and Milestones Process
iso-22301-2019::10.2Continual improvement
161R1-PM-6Measures of Performance

Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019(8 mappings)

iso-22301-2019::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
161R1-PM-11Mission and Business Process Definition
iso-22301-2019::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
161R1-SR-13Supplier Inventory
iso-22301-2019::4.2.1General
161R1-SR-13Supplier Inventory
iso-22301-2019::4.2.2Legal and regulatory requirements
161R1-PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
iso-22301-2019::4.3Determining the scope of the business continuity management system
161R1-PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
iso-22301-2019::4.3.1General
161R1-PM-5System Inventory
iso-22301-2019::4.3.2Scope of the business continuity management system
161R1-PM-5System Inventory
iso-22301-2019::4.4Business continuity management system
161R1-CP-1Policy and Procedures

Leadership, ISO 22301:2019(6 mappings)

iso-22301-2019::5.1Leadership and commitment
161R1-PM-2Information Security Program Leadership Role
iso-22301-2019::5.2Policy
161R1-CP-1Policy and Procedures
iso-22301-2019::5.2.1Establishing the business continuity policy
161R1-CP-1Policy and Procedures
iso-22301-2019::5.2.2Communicating the business continuity policy
161R1-CP-1Policy and Procedures
iso-22301-2019::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities2 targets
161R1-PM-2Information Security Program Leadership Role
161R1-PM-29Risk Management Program Leadership Roles

Planning, ISO 22301:2019(3 mappings)

iso-22301-2019::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
161R1-RA-3Risk Assessment
iso-22301-2019::6.1.1Determining risks and opportunities
161R1-RA-3Risk Assessment
iso-22301-2019::6.1.2Addressing risks and opportunities
161R1-RA-7Risk Response

+53 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 22301:2019 to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls your existing ISO 22301:2019 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 22301:2019 into NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 into ISO 22301:2019
36.8%

21 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 36 are genuine gaps.

52.6%Operation, ISO 22301:2019
50%Support, ISO 22301:2019
40%Leadership, ISO 22301:2019
25%Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 73 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action

Organizational process carrying weaknesses through to closure.

Grounded in 161R1-PM-4 Plan of Action and Milestones Process. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 10.2 Continual improvement

Continually improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the BCMS using qualitative and quantitative measures, considering the results of analysis and evaluation and the outputs of management review to determine whether there are...

Every one of the 21 evidenced controls and 36 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to ISO 22301:2019
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 98% in the header counts how many ISO 22301:2019 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22301:2019 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

ISO 22301:2019 has 57 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 covers 191 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 56 overlapping controls (98% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019, where 1 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22301:2019 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

Of 57 total ISO 22301:2019 controls, 56 map directly to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls, representing 98% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22301:2019 to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

1 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. The highest concentration of gaps is in Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22301:2019 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

The domain with the highest gap count is Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.