TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20000-1vsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how ISO 20000-1 controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20000-1 maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 21% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO 20000-1 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design(2 mappings)

ISO20000-03Capacity and availability management2 targets
→FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

ISO 20000-1: Service Transition(1 mappings)

ISO20000-06Change management processes
→FTC-314.4c7Change Management

ISO 20000-1: Service Operation(5 mappings)

ISO20000-11Incident management3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
ISO20000-15Access management for services2 targets
→FTC-314.4c1Access Controls
→FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20000-1 comparisons

ISO 20000-1 vs CSA CCM v45 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines5 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)5 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security5 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO 27001:20225 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ITIL 45 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model4 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs API 11644 mappings

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 20000-1 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

ISO 20000-1 has 19 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design, where 4 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20000-1 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 19 total ISO 20000-1 controls, 4 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20000-1 to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

15 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20000-1 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.