TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence SuppliersvsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 52% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Objective A: Managing Security Risk(5 mappings)

A.2Risk Assessment4 targets
→FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
→FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
A.5Security Training and Awareness
→FTC-314.4e1Security Awareness Training

Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack(8 mappings)

B.1Access Control2 targets
→FTC-314.4c1Access Controls
→FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication
B.2Data Protection and Encryption3 targets
→FTC-314.4c3Encryption
→FTC-314.4c6Secure Data Disposal
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
B.5Vulnerability Management3 targets
→FTC-314.4dTesting and Monitoring
→FTC-314.4hWritten Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-02Lloyd's Incident Reporting

Objective C: Detecting Cyber Security Events(2 mappings)

C.1Security Monitoring
→FTC-314.4dTesting and Monitoring
C.2Security Event Logging
→FTC-314.4c8Monitoring and Logging

Cyber Risk Profiles and Assurance(4 mappings)

CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment4 targets
→FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
→FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Objective D: Minimising Impact of Incidents(1 mappings)

D.1Incident Response Planning
→FTC-314.4c6Secure Data Disposal

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs CSA CCM v416 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)15 mappings

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers has 21 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack, where 3 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 21 total UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls, 11 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

10 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.