Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485vsNIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)

See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485 maps to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) with 7% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 ISO 13485 controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(3 mappings)

ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit3 targets
PQC-5Cryptographic Inventory and PQC Migration Roadmap
PQC-7FIPS Validated Modules, HSM Readiness, and Algorithm Validation
PQC-8Implementation Requirements - RNG, Side-Channel, Key Management, Operations, Incident Response

ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(3 mappings)

ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption3 targets
PQC-5Cryptographic Inventory and PQC Migration Roadmap
PQC-7FIPS Validated Modules, HSM Readiness, and Algorithm Validation
PQC-8Implementation Requirements - RNG, Side-Channel, Key Management, Operations, Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

Other NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

ISO 13485 has 29 controls across its framework, while NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards, where 6 ISO 13485 controls have no direct NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485 and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

Of 29 total ISO 13485 controls, 2 map directly to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

27 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.