Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 30% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 13485 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product Realisation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Resource Management(2 mappings)

6.3Information security awareness, education and training
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
6.4Logging and Monitoring
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms

ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(9 mappings)

ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization3 targets
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit2 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access2 targets
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring

ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(4 mappings)

ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
ISO13485-08Information access management2 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
ISO13485-09Security awareness and training program
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training

ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(3 mappings)

ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption2 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

ISO 13485: Physical Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO13485-17Facility access controls2 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

ISO 13485 has 44 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product Realisation, where 7 ISO 13485 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 44 total ISO 13485 controls, 13 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

31 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Product Realisation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product Realisation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.