Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485:2016vsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how ISO 13485:2016 controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
61
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485:2016 maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 14% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 78 ISO 13485:2016 controls identifies 72 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 78 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Quality management system – ISO 13485:2016(5 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements5 targets
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.1General
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.1General
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.3.1General
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.4.1General
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.5.1General

Product realization – ISO 13485:2016(12 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::7.2.3Communication3 targets
23894-5.5Communication and Consultation
ISO23894-6.1Communication and Consultation
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.2Communication and consultation
iso-13485-2016::7.3Design and development
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.10Design and development files
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.2Design and development planning
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.3Design and development inputs
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.4Design and development outputs
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.5Design and development review
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.6Design and development verification
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.7Design and development validation
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
iso-13485-2016::7.3.8Design and development transfer
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4Design
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 13485:2016 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls your existing ISO 13485:2016 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 13485:2016 into ISO/IEC 23894:2023
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 into ISO 13485:2016
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 13485:2016 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 14% in the header counts how many ISO 13485:2016 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

ISO 13485:2016 has 78 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 85 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016, where 23 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 78 total ISO 13485:2016 controls, 11 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, representing 14% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485:2016 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

72 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.